• RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Review: Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3

Go get'm, noob

World War III, the long awaited sequel to World War II, takes center stage as the primary conflict in the similarly anticipated Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3. The clash between Russia and the United States that began in Modern Warfare 2 is still in full swing. This latest iteration builds off the strong foundation set by its predecessors, especially in regards to multiplayer. However, the title’s aging engine and brief campaign really undermine the excitement around this long awaited conclusion.

The story continues literally right where Modern Warfare 2 left off with Captain Price trying to find medical help for Soap before he bleeds out. Players primarily take control of a new character named Yuri. Yuri is a former Spetsnaz that holds a huge grudge against Makarov, the megalomaniacal ultranationalist terrorist responsible for tearing the world asunder. As usual, missions have you jumping between multiple characters as they take part in this much larger conflict. The plot involves a scheme to kidnap the Russian president amidst a Russian declaration of full scale combat and chemical warfare against the United States and Europe. At times the narrative just seems like a tool to have you witness the destruction of major world cities such as New York, London, and Paris. While commendable, the story stumbles in its attempt to tie in the events of all three Modern Warfare titles together. Honestly, the story is at its best when it focuses in on the partnership between Soap and Price who have developed up quite the bromance over the course of their heroic escapades.

The campaign still has the same drawbacks that have been plaguing the series for years. Overly linear and stuffed with too many instances where it wants you to think you are doing something cool when all you are doing is responding to rudimentary button prompts. It tries too hard to elicit an emotional response, causing its attempts to fall flat. Any game that consistently tries to top itself and go bigger is eventually going to crash into the ceiling. There’s nothing as brazen as the infamous “No Russian” sequence but seeing the Manhattan skyline ablaze, the Eiffel Tower topple over, and possibly the worst vacation footage ever may not seem so impactful because of how blasé we as players have become from previous exposure to the same type of chaos.

The campaign plays out pretty much the same as past games with a different set of locales. As I played through it, I struggled to identify any notable gameplay additions. Everything you do seems to have been done in some previous Call of Duty campaign; the stealth missions, breaching through doors, and missions where you alternate between controlling ground troops and aircrafts providing support from above. You spend a noticeable amount of time manning machine guns or provide cover fire from the passenger seat of a speeding vehicle. On a positive note, the shooting feels responsive, the topography of the various battlefields is striking, and the enemies are formidable when playing on the higher difficulty settings. Of course, some of this is due to the persistent problem of enemies continuously coming out of nowhere to keep you pinned down before you realize you are supposed to push on through.

The visuals really show their age. What was once one of the most graphically impressive series around now looks flat and antiquated. That is not to say the game looks bad; some of the destruction is beautifully choreographed and a real experience to witness. The game runs at a consistent 60 frames per second, with infrequent drops that usually coincide with moments when the onscreen action is at its most explosive. Some of the level design also is uninteresting. The impoverished huts and hovels of India don’t look that much different from the Brazilian favelas from Modern Warfare 2. You start to notice a lot of the environments are things we’re used to fighting through, such as office buildings, shantytowns, and airplanes. The game does show off some unique new environments such as the catacombs in Paris, and what New York’s tunnels look like underwater. There are also a few glitches, my AI allies sometimes passed straight through cars.

One major glitch I experienced early on in my playthrough of the campaign is when the audio became drastically distorted before going out completely for a noticeable period of time. It came back suddenly and everything else was fine. Gunfire and explosions are accompanied by realistic and immersive sound design. The soundtrack’s overuse of guitar riffs is a point of contention but the orchestral score is strong as is the voiceover work.

So, the singleplayer doesn’t quite live up to its full potential. That’s okay because multiplayer has always been the series' main attraction and Modern Warfare 3 brings the goods. The 16 new maps serve as refined battlegrounds in which you can spend countless hours waging online warfare. The progression system is ridiculously deep. There are more unlocks and rewards than I am capable of keeping track of, although the game does a good job doing that for you. In total there are 19 modes of play meeting the needs of every possible playing style.

In addition to unlocking weapons through leveling up, weapons now level up as well. Constant use of a gun will add Weapon Proficiencies such as perks that reduce recoil or improve accuracy when firing from the hip. You can tailor you killstreak rewards to suit your style of play. Those (like me) that found it difficult to build up a killstreak high enough to unlock the most effective assault bonuses will be glad to have the option to have their kills carry over after death and count towards receiving support-based packages.

The best new mode is Kill Confirmed where the only way to earn points is to pick up the dog tags of fallen enemies from the opposing team. This mode completely changes the dynamic of team play. If you pick up the tag of one of your own teammates you prevent surrendering a point to the opposition. As a team you can use dog tags as a means to lure enemies into a trap. Picking up stray tags as you run around the map becomes a small delight, conversely dying before you can reap the rewards of hard earned kills will elicit a bloodthirsty desire for vengeance in a way few other game modes can replicate. Having to confirm your kills provides a real rush of adrenaline as you never know if your combat skills will be represented in your actual score.

Modern Warfare 3 heralds the premier of the new Call of Duty ELITE online service. There is an actual app you must download to access the many features ELITE has to offer in both free and premium editions. If you pony up the digital currency for a year’s subscription, you get monthly automatic downloads of DLC including all of the maps. The app tracks a ridiculous amount of stats from your multiplayer career and allows you to review recent matches and leaderboards. It also enhances your ability to connect with people you want to play with in Groups and Clans. For premium members there are year-round contests that across multiple skill levels to compete in. Call of Duty ELITE also provides inside info on weapons and levels to give players a strategic advantage. As an added bonus you can access two hours of double XP upon your initial download. All of this sounds promising but the launch has been less than stellar. I found it hard to access any content, likely due to the massive demand caused by the recent release. Assuming the service is able to overcome its current growing pains it represents a real step forward for the franchise’s already phenomenal multiplayer offerings. I look forward to monitoring my clan activity from my smartphone.

Spec Ops is now divided into Survival and Mission modes. Survival in theory sounds like Zombies mode without the zombies, but is in fact its own delightfully unique experience. In many ways it sticks to the tradition of the Survival modes found in other First Person Shooters in that you must defend yourself again wave after wave of increasingly more formidable enemies. The developers intelligently designed this mode where you start off with only a pistol and through killing your enemies, earn currency and XP that allow you to upgrade you arsenal by accessing reserves scattered throughout the map between waves. The enemies not only grow in number but in nerve, soon you will be facing off attack dogs, helicopters, and insurgents with C4 strapped to their chest. Thankfully the entire map is open to you giving you the freedom to take down foes as you want. All 16 multiplayer maps are utilized in this mode.

Many of the Spec Ops missions are derived from events in the campaign but sliced up and adapted into intense segments you can tackle either solo or with a partner. Mission objectives range from having to disarm nuclear weapons, to taking a VIP hostage aboard an airplane, to using stealth to slip by enemies unnoticed. Like in Modern Warfare 2, there are three difficulties to attempt and three different star ranks to try for. The leveling system in Spec Ops mirrors the one found in the multiplayer mode meaning you can sink just as many hours climbing the leader boards here.

It is easy to navigate between the three major game modes thanks to the clean and accessible menu system. From here you can see your completion percentage and playtime of each mode. While the Campaign only takes around five hours of your time, the amount of time you are likely to sink into Spec Ops and Multiplayer more than compensates for it. It feels strange to call the singleplayer mode an afterthought because it is evident that the aim was to deliver a highly detailed and sophisticated first-person experience, which it achieves in some respects, but ultimately it’s the weakest part of this package. Considering the majority of COD players are addicted to the still excellent multiplayer, the solo campaign’s faults are not as damaging to the overall appeal of the title.

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 is a great game hurt by its unwillingness to stray from a tried and true formula. Infinity Ward and Sledgehammer Games have crafted a game that delivers thrills that will satisfy a mass audience but has not given its biggest critics any reason to relent. Depending on who you are as a gamer, you will either dive right in and enjoy the latest Call of Duty because of its refinements or lament that a game with “Modern” in the title can feel so stuck in the past.

 

*Note: gamrReview was provided with a Hardened Edition of Modern Warfare 3 for PlayStation 3 by Activision for the purposes of this review.

Other versions:

To find out more about gamrReview reviews, visit our rating system page.

More Xbox360 Reviews

25 Comments

naznatips (on 10 November 2011)

Nice to see great gameplay and fun pacing in tact, but I've played this game three times this generation already, and I think I've finally hit the point that I don't need a fourth. Maybe cheap and used, but I can't justify a new purchase of COD anymore with all the original games coming out this year that are more demanding of my time and money.


Nybbas (on 12 November 2011)

I couldn't agree with you more here. Everyone loved to say (in regards to the bf3 vs mw3 debate) "lawl I'm getting them both" For me, as a full time graduate student, with a part time job (or anyone with a full time job) I don't know how you would have enough time to play all the games coming out. As it is now, I am halfway through about 8 different games, with about 10 others I would love to play :(

As far as multiplayer FPS are concerned, I don't have nearly as much time as I would like to play BF3, let alone devoting time to another different fps.


  • +1
trasharmdsister12 (on 10 November 2011)

"Depending on who you are as a gamer, you will either dive right in and enjoy the latest Call of Duty because of its refinements or lament that a game with “Modern” in the title can feel so stuck in the past." You read our minds. Why am I not surprised?


trasharmdsister12 (on 10 November 2011)

In case people don't think this comment has any relevancy or makes any sense, recall the man's name being Xavier.


  • +1
Dark_Lord_2008 (on 10 November 2011)

Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare remains the best Call of Duty game. MW2 and MW3 are little more than updates to the 2007 smash hit CoD 4: MW. The graphics and game play mechanics look outdated in 2011. The online MP of CoD 4: MW still out performs the more recent CoD games. MW3 is the 8th Call of Duty game in the series, one new CoD game every year. MW3 is must buy if you are a huge fan of CoD games. MW3 looks like a good weekend rental. 5 or 6 hour campaign mode is too short for a full priced game.


Jim6860 (on 13 November 2011)

I couldn't agree more. COD:MW is the best of any of them and though I have pretty much gotten away from shooters in general starting about 10 years ago years ago for multiplayer. MW gave me something I thought and still think is the best ever experience in MP play. MW2 was just too much and too many perks, MW was just right. I passed on BLOPs and did on MW3, hell I passed on Battlefield 3 as well. You're right, since MW, they are nothing but reboots with tweaks.


  • 0
Jim6860 (on 13 November 2011)

I couldn't agree more. COD:MW is the best of any of them and though I have pretty much gotten away from shooters in general starting about 10 years ago years ago for multiplayer. MW gave me something I thought and still think is the best ever experience in MP play. MW2 was just too much and too many perks, MW was just right. I passed on BLOPs and did on MW3, hell I passed on Battlefield 3 as well. You're right, since MW, they are nothing but reboots with tweaks.


  • 0
MARCUSDJACKSON (on 11 November 2011)

my personal review so far is an 8.5. its just not as strong as MW2 or BLOPS which i gave really bad scores. MW3 simply holds no weight to any COD that came before it. BLOPS graphics are by far the best of the series, and thats not saying much. i think i have some score to change cause so far i'm underwhelmed and far from impressed.


ryuzaki57 (on 11 November 2011)

Sniping is a lot better than in BF3. I will stick to this game although it has pretty lame graphics compared to Battlefield 3.


oniyide (on 10 November 2011)

sounds like they made MP even more noob friendly. Not sure if thats a good or bad thing, might break the game. SP sounds meh to me, which is sad because I quite enjoyed BLOPS'. Nice review, not kissing ass, but not downing it either. I'll still pass


scat398 (on 10 November 2011)

I'm enjoying the MP so far. I am a fan of several genres and FPS is one of them. I agree the game is ready for the next generation of hardware.


welshbloke (on 10 November 2011)

The score would be a fair reflection of my experience. I think the value is OK and the presentation number as this was poor especially coming off the back of Battlefield. I will resist comparing the value and presentation scores though... but only just.


Shajidh (on 15 December 2011)

I wonder why IGN gave it a higher rating than 8.5. This game is complete dirt when it comes to handling the servers. I've gotten the, "Server Connection Timed Out," message like a few 100 times. It gets annoying. IW actually made MW3 a bit different than MW2, but that doesn't mean it's fully different. IW has to improve more. We'll see what Treyarch has to bring this year. I think.


elmerFudd5 (on 06 December 2011)

all i know is the company that made this game must be so rich 6. some million sales on 360 5. some million sales on ps3 one of the highest ive seen on the website


elmerFudd5 (on 06 December 2011)

i did not play this yet but i own bf3 and it rulez. i guarantee you bf3 is the best bet this time aronund


Icey7 (on 22 November 2011)

Played all the COD games since MW1 and with the exception of Black Ops which was excellent all the rest have had a terrible single player campaign. I think this will be my last COD game.


DarkMarine (on 15 November 2011)

Well, using most people's statements' here. CoD4 was an amazing game and if it is the same game then shouldn't have equal to or better scores then? Quit complaining on the score of the game then.


Slimebeast (on 13 November 2011)

I love the restricted score you gave it.


GamesBond (on 12 November 2011)

When you experienced the audio bug, was that before or after the update?


Munkeh111 (on 12 November 2011)

I really enjoyed the campaign, and I did feel something for the 3 biggest moments in the game, probably because they are both quite close to my heart. As for seeing New York ablaze, I was just too busy shooting people for most of the time, but when I did get the chance, I did stop and stare in amazement. (but yeah, the campaign is not as good as 4, but I don't think I will ever play an FPS which I will enjoy as much as that game) But, with spec ops, I have already got 10 hours from the game, and will probably get many more, even if I didn't play the MP, so there is still value in this game As for graphics, I thought it looked good enough, though I haven't played Battlefield. Having said that, I do feel that IW should not release another game until next gen, which will hopefully give them 2-3 years to make their next game


Nybbas (on 12 November 2011)

I never had a problem with MW visuals/sound. After playing BF3 for the past few weeks, and then watching some multiplayer mw3 videos, I was completely shocked. The way the guns sound, and the character animations in mw are really really bad.


  • 0
PullusPardus (on 10 November 2011)

next time when you review something, post screenshots of your own.


yo_john117 (on 10 November 2011)

Looks like a very good COD.


Mordred11 (on 10 November 2011)

I need to play this game. Great review Xavier.


pezus (on 10 November 2011)

Very good review. I especially liked what you said at the end: "Depending on who you are as a gamer, you will either dive right in and enjoy the latest Call of Duty because of its refinements or lament that a game with “Modern” in the title can feel so stuck in the past."


mantlepiecek (on 10 November 2011)

Won't be getting this. They have enough people playing this game and I have enough games to play.


Smeags (on 10 November 2011)

Major reviews everywhere! Ahhhh! Great review Xavier, keep up the good work. ^_^


gmcosta (on 14 November 2011)

I really disliked the game. MW1 graphics, the sound laks on quality. and the gameplay it's not better than MW2, to be honest, MW2 is a great game for the time it was launched, but as everyone expected MW3 should be better in all aspects... For me ? Disapointed....


Joji (on 13 November 2011)

An 8.6!? I expected a 7 or lower; I don't see how stealing game modes from Halo can get this game a 8.6 rating. :/ And all the action and explosions are just coverups for the bad effort they put in for graphics. At times, singleplayer was boring, but sometimes it was fun. Multiplayer is quite good as well, but the spawn system... I really don't know. Perhaps it's because I'm a noob. :P


Runa216 (on 10 November 2011)

still wanna play it!